The political economy of results-base financing: the experience of the healthsystem in Zimbabwe
Since 2000, results based financing (RBF) has proliferated in health sectors in Africa in particular, including in fragile and conflict-affected settings (FCAS) and there is a growing but still contested literature about its relevance and effectiveness. Less examined are the political economy factors behind the adoption of the RBF policy, as well as the shifts in influence and resources which RBF may bring about. In this article, we examine these two topics, focusing on Zimbabwe, which has rolled out RBF nationwide in the health system since 2011, with external support.
Our findings highlight the role of donors in initiating the RBF policy, but also how the Zimbabwe health system was able to adapt the model to suit its particular circumstances – seeking to maintain a systemic approach, and avoiding fragmentation. Although Zimbabwe was highly resource dependent after the political-economic crisis of the 2000s, it retained managerial and professional capacity, which distinguishes it from many other FCAS settings. This active adaptation has engendered national ownership over time, despite initial resistance to the RBF model and despite the complexity of RBF, which creates dependence on external technical support. Adoption was also aided by ideological retro-fitting into an earlier government performance management policy. The main beneficiaries of RBF were frontline providers, who gained small but critical additional resources, but subject to high degrees of control and sanctions.
This study highlights resource-seeking motivations for adopting RBF in some low and middle income settings, especially fragile ones, but also the potential for local health system actors to shape and adapt RBF to suit their needs in some circumstances. This means less structural disruption in the health system and it increases the likelihood of an integrated approach and sustainability. We highlight the mix of autonomy and control which RBF can bring for frontline providers and argue for clearer understanding of the role that RBF commonly plays in these settings.
Accessing the paper
Witter S, Chirwa Y, Chandiwana P, Munyati S, Pepukai M, Bertone MP. The political economy of results-basedfinancing: the experience of the healthsystem in Zimbabwe. Global Health Research and Policy 2019 4:20 https://doi.org/10.1186/s41256-019-0111-5
NB This case study featured in a presentation given by Maria Bertone at the International Health Economics Association congress in Basel in July 2019. Read it here.